GD incident on 2018-08-26 — MT

Operator
Energy West Montana
Cause
Pipe, Weld, Or Joint Failure
Commodity
Natural Gas
Program
GD
Damage and Injuries
0 fatalities 0 injuries
Property damage (nominal)
$900
Incident datetime
2018-08-26 06:27
Report number
Location
MT, CASCADE
Narrative
The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling were directly under the footing and foundation of 4601 willowdale lane. There appeared to be external damage to the 1" coupling and the 1" cts piping appears to have been lowered in place by the home builder. The 1" cts piping was a dead end service stub and was unknowingly operating at 230 psi due to a previous uprate of a 10" steel pipeline. The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling were subject to a shockwave created by the home explosion. The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling is being sent to an independent lab for a forensic investigation and testing. 4/12/2019: lab testing results were received from two third party consultants. Results indicated that the 1" coupling failed due to slow crack growth propagation as a result of multiple stresses being applied to the fitting. Per the reports, the crack growth and leak point on the coupling was consistent with a tensile load on the coupling. The phenomena of a brittle crack which starts in the location where the heat fusion joined tubing terminates on the interior of a socket fusion has been documented previously in industry. The crack formed by the notch geometry created by the inserted tubing and its point of heat fusion joining to the socket which, when under gas pressure, can create a stress riser. The notch geometry may have been contributed by the socket fusion tools available at the time of installation. The failure is also consistent with industry knowledge of aldyl-a pipe and fittings manufactured prior to 1984 and susceptibility to inner wall cracking. The coupling was 10" under the foundation of the garage and appeared to be lowered in place during the construction of the structure. Lowering would have caused tensile stress on the pipe and coupling. No external damages were seen on the pipe or coupling from construction of the garage structure. Again per the reports, the internal pressure in the pipe may have accelerated the failure in the coupling but could not be determined as the sole root cause of the failure. The time to failure from cracking could not be estimated or determined in either report. 11/19/2019 - submitted as final report without further changes at this time.
Detailed record list
Occurred At
2018-08-26 06:27:00
Year
2018
Report Received Date
2018-09-13 00:00:00
Iyear
2018.0
Report Number
20180084.0
Supplemental Number
33027.0
Report Type
Supplemental Final
Operator Id
Name
Energy West Montana
Operator Street Address
No. 1 First Avenue South P.o. Box 2229
Operator City Name
Great Falls
Operator State Abbreviation
MT
Operator Postal Code
59403-2229
Local Datetime
2018-08-26 03:39:00
Location Street Address
4601 Willowdale Lane
Location City Name
Great Falls
Location County Name
Cascade
Location State Abbreviation
MT
Location Postal Code
59404
Location Latitude
Location Longitude
Nrc Rpt Datetime
2018-08-26 13:52:00
Nrc Rpt Num
Commodity Released Type
Natural Gas
Unintentional Release
0.1
Fatality Ind
No
Fatal
0
Injury Ind
No
Injure
0
Ignite Ind
Yes
Explode Ind
Yes
Num Pub Evacuated
2.0
Incident Identified Datetime
2018-08-26 06:27:00
On Site Datetime
2018-08-26 03:55:00
Federal
No
Location Type
Private Property
Incident Area Type
Underground
Incident Area Subtype
Under A Building
Depth Of Cover
60.0
Crossing
No
Pipe Facility Type
Privately Owned
System Part Involved
Service
Installation Year
1980.0
Pipe Diameter
1.0
Pipe Specification
Astm D2513
Pipe Manufacturer
Dupont
Material Involved
Plastic
Plastic Type
Polyethylene (Pe)
Plastic Sdr
11.5
Material Pe Pipe Code
2306
Release Type
Leak
Leak Type
Connection Failure
Class Location Type
Class 3 Location
Est Cost Oper Paid
700000.0
Est Cost Prop Damage
900.0
Est Cost Emergency
7100.0
Est Cost Other
0.0
Est Cost Unintentional Release
0.0
Prpty
708000.0
Commercial Affected
0.0
Industrial Affected
0.0
Residences Affected
2.0
Accident Psig
230.0
Normal Psig
60.0
Mop Psig
60.0
Accident Pressure
Pressure Exceeded The Applicable Allowance In 192.201
Scada In Place Ind
No
Accident Identifier
Notification From Emergency Responder
Investigation Status
No, the facility was not monitored by a controller(s) at the time of the incident
Employee Drug Test Ind
No
Contractor Drug Test Ind
No
Cause
Pipe, Weld, Or Joint Failure
Cause Details
Fusion Joint
Pwjf Failure Type
Fusion Joint
Plastic Joint Subtype
Socket, Heat Fusion
Fpw Installed Year
1980
Fpw Other Attr
Aldyl-A
Fpw First Plastic Type
Polyethylene (Pe)
Fpw Second Plastic Type
Polyethylene (Pe)
Additional Other Ind
Yes
Additional Factor Details
Tensile Stress, & External And Internal Pressure
Result Previous Ind
Yes
Hydrotest Conducted Ind
No
Preparer Name
I** S******
Preparer Title
Safety Director
Preparer Email
I*******@e***.net
Preparer Telephone
4068680748
Authorizer Name
I** S******
Authorizer Title
Safety Director
Authorizer Telephone
4068680748
Authorizer Email
I*******@e***.net
Narrative
The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling were directly under the footing and foundation of 4601 willowdale lane. There appeared to be external damage to the 1" coupling and the 1" cts piping appears to have been lowered in place by the home builder. The 1" cts piping was a dead end service stub and was unknowingly operating at 230 psi due to a previous uprate of a 10" steel pipeline. The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling were subject to a shockwave created by the home explosion. The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling is being sent to an independent lab for a forensic investigation and testing. 4/12/2019: lab testing results were received from two third party consultants. Results indicated that the 1" coupling failed due to slow crack growth propagation as a result of multiple stresses being applied to the fitting. Per the reports, the crack growth and leak point on the coupling was consistent with a tensile load on the coupling. The phenomena of a brittle crack which starts in the location where the heat fusion joined tubing terminates on the interior of a socket fusion has been documented previously in industry. The crack formed by the notch geometry created by the inserted tubing and its point of heat fusion joining to the socket which, when under gas pressure, can create a stress riser. The notch geometry may have been contributed by the socket fusion tools available at the time of installation. The failure is also consistent with industry knowledge of aldyl-a pipe and fittings manufactured prior to 1984 and susceptibility to inner wall cracking. The coupling was 10" under the foundation of the garage and appeared to be lowered in place during the construction of the structure. Lowering would have caused tensile stress on the pipe and coupling. No external damages were seen on the pipe or coupling from construction of the garage structure. Again per the reports, the internal pressure in the pipe may have accelerated the failure in the coupling but could not be determined as the sole root cause of the failure. The time to failure from cracking could not be estimated or determined in either report. 11/19/2019 - submitted as final report without further changes at this time.
Occurred At 2018-08-26 06:27:00
Year 2018
Report Received Date 2018-09-13 00:00:00
Iyear 2018.0
Report Number 20180084.0
Supplemental Number 33027.0
Report Type Supplemental Final
Operator Id 31191 PHMSA Enforcement
Name Energy West Montana
Operator Street Address No. 1 First Avenue South P.o. Box 2229
Operator City Name Great Falls
Operator State Abbreviation MT
Operator Postal Code 59403-2229
Local Datetime 2018-08-26 03:39:00
Location Street Address 4601 Willowdale Lane
Location City Name Great Falls
Location County Name Cascade
Location State Abbreviation MT
Location Postal Code 59404
Location Latitude 47.46361 Google Maps OpenStreetMap
Location Longitude -111.31722 Google Maps OpenStreetMap
Nrc Rpt Datetime 2018-08-26 13:52:00
Nrc Rpt Num 1222758 NRC Report How to search
Commodity Released Type Natural Gas
Unintentional Release 0.1
Fatality Ind No
Fatal 0
Injury Ind No
Injure 0
Ignite Ind Yes
Explode Ind Yes
Num Pub Evacuated 2.0
Incident Identified Datetime 2018-08-26 06:27:00
On Site Datetime 2018-08-26 03:55:00
Federal No
Location Type Private Property
Incident Area Type Underground
Incident Area Subtype Under A Building
Depth Of Cover 60.0
Crossing No
Pipe Facility Type Privately Owned
System Part Involved Service
Installation Year 1980.0
Pipe Diameter 1.0
Pipe Specification Astm D2513
Pipe Manufacturer Dupont
Material Involved Plastic
Plastic Type Polyethylene (Pe)
Plastic Sdr 11.5
Material Pe Pipe Code 2306
Release Type Leak
Leak Type Connection Failure
Class Location Type Class 3 Location
Est Cost Oper Paid 700000.0
Est Cost Prop Damage 900.0
Est Cost Emergency 7100.0
Est Cost Other 0.0
Est Cost Unintentional Release 0.0
Prpty 708000.0
Commercial Affected 0.0
Industrial Affected 0.0
Residences Affected 2.0
Accident Psig 230.0
Normal Psig 60.0
Mop Psig 60.0
Accident Pressure Pressure Exceeded The Applicable Allowance In 192.201
Scada In Place Ind No
Accident Identifier Notification From Emergency Responder
Investigation Status No, the facility was not monitored by a controller(s) at the time of the incident
Employee Drug Test Ind No
Contractor Drug Test Ind No
Cause Pipe, Weld, Or Joint Failure
Cause Details Fusion Joint
Pwjf Failure Type Fusion Joint
Plastic Joint Subtype Socket, Heat Fusion
Fpw Installed Year 1980
Fpw Other Attr Aldyl-A
Fpw First Plastic Type Polyethylene (Pe)
Fpw Second Plastic Type Polyethylene (Pe)
Additional Other Ind Yes
Additional Factor Details Tensile Stress, & External And Internal Pressure
Result Previous Ind Yes
Hydrotest Conducted Ind No
Preparer Name I** S******
Preparer Title Safety Director
Preparer Email I*******@e***.net
Preparer Telephone 4068680748
Authorizer Name I** S******
Authorizer Title Safety Director
Authorizer Telephone 4068680748
Authorizer Email I*******@e***.net
Narrative The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling were directly under the footing and foundation of 4601 willowdale lane. There appeared to be external damage to the 1" coupling and the 1" cts piping appears to have been lowered in place by the home builder. The 1" cts piping was a dead end service stub and was unknowingly operating at 230 psi due to a previous uprate of a 10" steel pipeline. The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling were subject to a shockwave created by the home explosion. The 1" cts, sdr 11.5, aldyl-a pipe and 1" socket fusion coupling is being sent to an independent lab for a forensic investigation and testing. 4/12/2019: lab testing results were received from two third party consultants. Results indicated that the 1" coupling failed due to slow crack growth propagation as a result of multiple stresses being applied to the fitting. Per the reports, the crack growth and leak point on the coupling was consistent with a tensile load on the coupling. The phenomena of a brittle crack which starts in the location where the heat fusion joined tubing terminates on the interior of a socket fusion has been documented previously in industry. The crack formed by the notch geometry created by the inserted tubing and its point of heat fusion joining to the socket which, when under gas pressure, can create a stress riser. The notch geometry may have been contributed by the socket fusion tools available at the time of installation. The failure is also consistent with industry knowledge of aldyl-a pipe and fittings manufactured prior to 1984 and susceptibility to inner wall cracking. The coupling was 10" under the foundation of the garage and appeared to be lowered in place during the construction of the structure. Lowering would have caused tensile stress on the pipe and coupling. No external damages were seen on the pipe or coupling from construction of the garage structure. Again per the reports, the internal pressure in the pipe may have accelerated the failure in the coupling but could not be determined as the sole root cause of the failure. The time to failure from cracking could not be estimated or determined in either report. 11/19/2019 - submitted as final report without further changes at this time.

All rights reserved. Copyright © by ClearPHMSA