HL incident on 2017-07-05 — TX

Operator
Motiva Enterprise Llc
Cause
Corrosion Failure
Commodity
Refined And/or Petroleum Product (Non-Hvl) Which Is A Liquid At Ambient Conditions
Program
HL
Damage and Injuries
0 fatalities 0 injuries
Property damage (nominal)
$2,414
Incident datetime
2017-07-05 16:00
Report number
Location
TX
Narrative
The 5-6 line which transports finished lube products from the motiva port arthur refinery to the motiva port arthur marine terminal, was discovered to be leaking on july 5, 2017. As a result, the line was excavated for inspection and repair. Failure was observed along the longitudinal axis of the pipe in one area, measured to be approximate 17 inches long. Cross section of pipe containing the failure was submitted to an independent metallurgical testing lab for analysis. Based on extensive examination, the conclusion was made that in most likelihood, failure was the result of ductile fracture along a non-optimal erw seam. The failure onset was facilitated by: 1. Intermittent patches of lack of fusion along the erw joint and 2. Significant od surface wall loss due to preferential corrosion along the side of the pipe corresponding to the erw. It is suspected that the out of service, blocked in line over-pressured due to thermal expansion but exact failure pressure could not be determined through the failure analysis.
Detailed record list
Report Received Date
2017-08-03 00:00:00
Iyear
2017
Report Number
20170234
Supplemental Number
30174
Report Type
Supplemental Final
Operator Id
Name
Motiva Enterprise Llc
Operator Street Address
One Allen Center 500 Dallas Street
Operator City Name
Houston
Operator State Abbreviation
TX
Operator Postal Code
77002
Local Datetime
2017-07-05 16:00:00
Location Latitude
Location Longitude
Commodity Released Type
Refined And/or Petroleum Product (Non-Hvl) Which Is A Liquid At Ambient Conditions
Commodity Subtype
Other
Commodity Details
Lube Oil - Star 12
Unintentional Release Bbls
0.62
Recovered Bbls
0.6
Fatality Ind
No
Fatal
0
Injury Ind
No
Injure
0
Accident Identifier
Local Operating Personnel, Including Contractors
Operator Type
Contractor Working For The Operator
Incident Identified Datetime
2017-07-05 16:00:00
System Part Involved
Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites
On Off Shore
Onshore
Shutdown Due Accident Ind
Yes
Shutdown Datetime
2017-07-05 16:00:00
Restart Datetime
2017-10-18 17:00:00
On Site Datetime
2017-07-05 16:00:00
Nrc Rpt Datetime
2017-07-05 17:15:00
Nrc Rpt Num
Ignite Ind
No
Explode Ind
No
Upstream Valve Type Ind
Manual
Downstream Valve Type Ind
Manual
Num Pub Evacuated
0
Pipe Fac Name
5-6 Lube Line
Segment Name
5-6 Lube Line
Onshore State Abbreviation
Tx
Onshore Postal Code
77640
Onshore City Name
Port Arthur
Onshore County Name
Jefferson County
Designated Location
Milepost/valve Station
Designated Name
West Gate
Federal
No
Location Type
Pipeline Right-Of-Way
Incident Area Type
Underground
Incident Area Subtype
Under Soil
Depth Of Cover
6
Crossing
No
Pipe Facility Type
Intrastate
Item Involved
Pipe
Pipe Type
Pipe Seam
Pipe Diameter
6
Pipe Wall Thickness
0.28
Pipe Smys
24000
Pipe Specification
Grade B
Pipe Seam Type
Erw � Unknown Frequency
Pipe Manufacturer
Unknown
Pipe Coating Type
Coal Tar
Installation Year
1952
Manufactured Year
Unknown
Material Involved
Carbon Steel
Release Type
Rupture
Rupture Orient
Longitudinal
Rupture Width
1.5
Rupture Length
17
Wildlife Impact Ind
No
Soil Contamination
Yes
Long Term Assessment
No
Remediation Ind
Yes
Soil Remed Ind
Yes
Vegetation Remed Ind
Yes
Water Contam Ind
No
Could Be Hca
Yes
Commodity Reached Hca
No
Est Cost Oper Paid
0
Est Cost Gas Released
2
Est Cost Prop Damage
2414
Est Cost Emergency
0
Est Cost Environmental
12500
Est Cost Other
0
Est Cost Other Details
Emergency Response Was Handled Internally By The Motiva Emergency Response Team
Prpty
14916
Accident Psig
0
Mop Psig
400
Accident Pressure
Pressure Did Not Exceed Mop
Pressure Restriction Ind
No
Length Segment Isolated
10150
Internal Inspection Ind
Yes
Operation Complications Ind
No
Pipeline Function
< 20% Smys Regulated Transmission
Scada In Place Ind
Yes
Scada Operating Ind
Yes
Scada Functional Ind
Yes
Scada Detection Ind
No
Scada Conf Ind
No
Cpm In Place Ind
No
Investigation Status
No, the operator did not find that an investigation of the controller(s) actions or control room issues was necessary due to: (provide an explanation for why the operator did not investigate)
Investigation Status Details
Line was not in service at the time of the incident, the line was blocked in.
Employee Drug Test Ind
No
Contractor Drug Test Ind
No
Cause
Corrosion Failure
Cause Details
External Corrosion
Internal External
External Corrosion
Visual Exam Results
General Corrosion
Selective Seam Corrosion Ind
Yes
Field Exam Basis Ind
Yes
Metallurgical Basis Ind
Yes
Underground Location
Yes
Under Cathodic Protection Ind
Yes
Cathodic Pro Start Year
Unknown
Shielding Evident
No
Cathodic Survey Type
Yes
Cp Annual Survey Ind
Yes
Cp Annual Survey Year
2016
Prior Damage
No
Collected Data Ind
Yes
Geometry Deformation Ind
Yes
Other Tool Tech Ind
Yes
Geometry Recent Year
2015
Other Tool
Ili
Other Recent Year
2015
Has Hydrtst Conduc Before Ind
Yes
Hydrtst Most Rcnt Year
2011
Hydrtst Most Rcnt Pressure
600
Direct Asmnt Conducted
Yes, But The Point Of The Accident Was Not Identified As A Dig Site
Direct Asmnt Pnt Not Idntf Yr
2015
Non Destructive Exam Ind
Yes
Exm Other Type
Ili
Exm Other Rcnt Year
2015
Exm Other Rcnt Ind
Yes
Preparer Name
E******** R**
Preparer Title
Dot Compliance Specialist
Preparer Email
E************@m*****.com
Preparer Telephone
409-989-7150
Prepared Date
2018-04-09 00:00:00
Authorizer Name
G*** L*******
Authorizer Telephone
409-989-7001
Authorizer Title
General Manager
Authorizer Email
G************@m*****.com
Narrative
The 5-6 line which transports finished lube products from the motiva port arthur refinery to the motiva port arthur marine terminal, was discovered to be leaking on july 5, 2017. As a result, the line was excavated for inspection and repair. Failure was observed along the longitudinal axis of the pipe in one area, measured to be approximate 17 inches long. Cross section of pipe containing the failure was submitted to an independent metallurgical testing lab for analysis. Based on extensive examination, the conclusion was made that in most likelihood, failure was the result of ductile fracture along a non-optimal erw seam. The failure onset was facilitated by: 1. Intermittent patches of lack of fusion along the erw joint and 2. Significant od surface wall loss due to preferential corrosion along the side of the pipe corresponding to the erw. It is suspected that the out of service, blocked in line over-pressured due to thermal expansion but exact failure pressure could not be determined through the failure analysis.
Report Received Date 2017-08-03 00:00:00
Iyear 2017
Report Number 20170234
Supplemental Number 30174
Report Type Supplemental Final
Operator Id 30777 PHMSA Enforcement
Name Motiva Enterprise Llc
Operator Street Address One Allen Center 500 Dallas Street
Operator City Name Houston
Operator State Abbreviation TX
Operator Postal Code 77002
Local Datetime 2017-07-05 16:00:00
Location Latitude 29.873832 Google Maps OpenStreetMap
Location Longitude -93.957803 Google Maps OpenStreetMap
Commodity Released Type Refined And/or Petroleum Product (Non-Hvl) Which Is A Liquid At Ambient Conditions
Commodity Subtype Other
Commodity Details Lube Oil - Star 12
Unintentional Release Bbls 0.62
Recovered Bbls 0.6
Fatality Ind No
Fatal 0
Injury Ind No
Injure 0
Accident Identifier Local Operating Personnel, Including Contractors
Operator Type Contractor Working For The Operator
Incident Identified Datetime 2017-07-05 16:00:00
System Part Involved Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites
On Off Shore Onshore
Shutdown Due Accident Ind Yes
Shutdown Datetime 2017-07-05 16:00:00
Restart Datetime 2017-10-18 17:00:00
On Site Datetime 2017-07-05 16:00:00
Nrc Rpt Datetime 2017-07-05 17:15:00
Nrc Rpt Num 1183189 NRC Report How to search
Ignite Ind No
Explode Ind No
Upstream Valve Type Ind Manual
Downstream Valve Type Ind Manual
Num Pub Evacuated 0
Pipe Fac Name 5-6 Lube Line
Segment Name 5-6 Lube Line
Onshore State Abbreviation Tx
Onshore Postal Code 77640
Onshore City Name Port Arthur
Onshore County Name Jefferson County
Designated Location Milepost/valve Station
Designated Name West Gate
Federal No
Location Type Pipeline Right-Of-Way
Incident Area Type Underground
Incident Area Subtype Under Soil
Depth Of Cover 6
Crossing No
Pipe Facility Type Intrastate
Item Involved Pipe
Pipe Type Pipe Seam
Pipe Diameter 6
Pipe Wall Thickness 0.28
Pipe Smys 24000
Pipe Specification Grade B
Pipe Seam Type Erw � Unknown Frequency
Pipe Manufacturer Unknown
Pipe Coating Type Coal Tar
Installation Year 1952
Manufactured Year Unknown
Material Involved Carbon Steel
Release Type Rupture
Rupture Orient Longitudinal
Rupture Width 1.5
Rupture Length 17
Wildlife Impact Ind No
Soil Contamination Yes
Long Term Assessment No
Remediation Ind Yes
Soil Remed Ind Yes
Vegetation Remed Ind Yes
Water Contam Ind No
Could Be Hca Yes
Commodity Reached Hca No
Est Cost Oper Paid 0
Est Cost Gas Released 2
Est Cost Prop Damage 2414
Est Cost Emergency 0
Est Cost Environmental 12500
Est Cost Other 0
Est Cost Other Details Emergency Response Was Handled Internally By The Motiva Emergency Response Team
Prpty 14916
Accident Psig 0
Mop Psig 400
Accident Pressure Pressure Did Not Exceed Mop
Pressure Restriction Ind No
Length Segment Isolated 10150
Internal Inspection Ind Yes
Operation Complications Ind No
Pipeline Function < 20% Smys Regulated Transmission
Scada In Place Ind Yes
Scada Operating Ind Yes
Scada Functional Ind Yes
Scada Detection Ind No
Scada Conf Ind No
Cpm In Place Ind No
Investigation Status No, the operator did not find that an investigation of the controller(s) actions or control room issues was necessary due to: (provide an explanation for why the operator did not investigate)
Investigation Status Details Line was not in service at the time of the incident, the line was blocked in.
Employee Drug Test Ind No
Contractor Drug Test Ind No
Cause Corrosion Failure
Cause Details External Corrosion
Internal External External Corrosion
Visual Exam Results General Corrosion
Selective Seam Corrosion Ind Yes
Field Exam Basis Ind Yes
Metallurgical Basis Ind Yes
Underground Location Yes
Under Cathodic Protection Ind Yes
Cathodic Pro Start Year Unknown
Shielding Evident No
Cathodic Survey Type Yes
Cp Annual Survey Ind Yes
Cp Annual Survey Year 2016
Prior Damage No
Collected Data Ind Yes
Geometry Deformation Ind Yes
Other Tool Tech Ind Yes
Geometry Recent Year 2015
Other Tool Ili
Other Recent Year 2015
Has Hydrtst Conduc Before Ind Yes
Hydrtst Most Rcnt Year 2011
Hydrtst Most Rcnt Pressure 600
Direct Asmnt Conducted Yes, But The Point Of The Accident Was Not Identified As A Dig Site
Direct Asmnt Pnt Not Idntf Yr 2015
Non Destructive Exam Ind Yes
Exm Other Type Ili
Exm Other Rcnt Year 2015
Exm Other Rcnt Ind Yes
Preparer Name E******** R**
Preparer Title Dot Compliance Specialist
Preparer Email E************@m*****.com
Preparer Telephone 409-989-7150
Prepared Date 2018-04-09 00:00:00
Authorizer Name G*** L*******
Authorizer Telephone 409-989-7001
Authorizer Title General Manager
Authorizer Email G************@m*****.com
Narrative The 5-6 line which transports finished lube products from the motiva port arthur refinery to the motiva port arthur marine terminal, was discovered to be leaking on july 5, 2017. As a result, the line was excavated for inspection and repair. Failure was observed along the longitudinal axis of the pipe in one area, measured to be approximate 17 inches long. Cross section of pipe containing the failure was submitted to an independent metallurgical testing lab for analysis. Based on extensive examination, the conclusion was made that in most likelihood, failure was the result of ductile fracture along a non-optimal erw seam. The failure onset was facilitated by: 1. Intermittent patches of lack of fusion along the erw joint and 2. Significant od surface wall loss due to preferential corrosion along the side of the pipe corresponding to the erw. It is suspected that the out of service, blocked in line over-pressured due to thermal expansion but exact failure pressure could not be determined through the failure analysis.

All rights reserved. Copyright © by ClearPHMSA