HL incident on 2013-06-12 — TX

Operator
Holly Energy Partners - Operating, L.p.
Cause
Excavation Issue
Commodity
Refined And/or Petroleum Product (Non-Hvl) Which Is A Liquid At Ambient Conditions
Program
HL
Damage and Injuries
0 fatalities 0 injuries
Property damage (nominal)
$20,000
Incident datetime
2013-06-12 14:04
Report number
Location
TX
Narrative
Tech con trenching struck the pipeline while trenching on june 12, 2013. Tech con had failed to (1) send proper one-call notification; (2) accurately identify or white line the area of excavation; or (3) notify holly energy prior to excavating and/or exposing (pot-holing) the pipeline so that holly energy could re-mark the pipeline and witness this excavation process as requested in accordance with texas utility code subchapter d sec. 251.151(c). Tech con trenching never notified holly energy of its intent to excavate across holly energy's pipeline. Holly energy received a one-call notice from jd king on the evening of june 6. Holly energy does not fully understand the connection between tech con trenching and jd king, but both entities appeared to have been working on the same project for which tech con trenching was conducting trenching on june 13. On the morning of june 7, john osborne of holly energy called ricky knelsen of jd king at the number identified on the one-call notification ticket but received no response. On the morning of june 10 (june 8 and 9 were weekend days), osborne reached knelsen by telephone to request a description of where jd king planned to excavate. The one-call ticket did not provide a clear identification of the area, and neither jd king (nor tech con trenching) had marked the proposed excavation area with white lines. After osborne explained the location of holly energy's pipeline, knelsen told osborne that jd king would not start excavating in the vicinity of the pipeline until the week of june 17. Osborne and knelsen agreed that the two would meet at the site at this time so that knelsen could identify where the excavation would cross the pipeline and osborne would mark the pipeline in advance of trenching activities. Knelsen said that he would call osborne when the excavation was closer to the pipeline to arrange the meeting specifics. Osborne also told knelsen that holly energy wished to be present during excavation so that osborne could visually observe pot-holes cored adjacent to the pipeline and to ensure that excavation below holly energy's pipeline was performed safely. As indicated above, knelsen told osborne that jd king would not arrive to the pipeline area until the week of june 17. But, the excavators moved into the area much sooner than osborne had been told, and neither knelsen nor anyone else with jd king called osborne to inform him of this fact. On june 12, excavation equipment hit holly energy's pipeline, causing significant damage and the release of product to the environment. It is noteworthy that, as a result of a prior one-call notification, holly energy's pipeline was already marked in the area where the trenching equipment hit the pipeline with yellow pin flags. Holly energy's yellow pin flags. Holly energy's yellow pin flags were still present and visible when holly energy representatives arrived to the site after its line was struck.
Detailed record list
Report Received Date
2013-07-12 00:00:00
Iyear
2013
Report Number
20130246
Supplemental Number
18285
Report Type
Supplemental Final
Operator Id
Name
Holly Energy Partners - Operating, L.p.
Operator Street Address
2323 Victory Ave. Suite 1400
Operator City Name
Dallas
Operator State Abbreviation
TX
Operator Postal Code
75219
Local Datetime
2013-06-12 14:04:00
Location Latitude
Location Longitude
Commodity Released Type
Refined And/or Petroleum Product (Non-Hvl) Which Is A Liquid At Ambient Conditions
Commodity Subtype
Gasoline (Non-Ethanol)
Unintentional Release Bbls
4153
Recovered Bbls
1119
Fatality Ind
No
Fatal
0
Injury Ind
No
Injure
0
Accident Identifier
Cpm Leak Detection System Or Scada-Based Information (Such As Alarm(S), Alert(S), Event(S), And/or Volume Calculations)
Incident Identified Datetime
2013-06-12 14:04:00
System Part Involved
Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites
On Off Shore
Onshore
Shutdown Due Accident Ind
No
Shutdown Explain
The Pipeline Was At A Shutdown State When The Incident Occurred.
On Site Datetime
2013-06-12 15:30:00
Nrc Rpt Datetime
2013-06-12 16:11:00
Nrc Rpt Num
Ignite Ind
No
Explode Ind
No
Upstream Valve Type Ind
Manual
Downstream Valve Type Ind
Manual
Num Pub Evacuated
0
Pipe Fac Name
10" Fintex
Segment Name
Fintex: Midland To Wheeler
Onshore State Abbreviation
Tx
Onshore Postal Code
79701
Onshore City Name
Midland
Onshore County Name
Midland
Designated Location
Milepost/valve Station
Designated Name
W Airport Vlv
Federal
No
Location Type
Pipeline Right-Of-Way
Incident Area Type
Underground
Incident Area Subtype
Under Soil
Depth Of Cover
18
Crossing
No
Pipe Facility Type
Intrastate
Item Involved
Pipe
Pipe Type
Pipe Body
Pipe Diameter
10.75
Pipe Wall Thickness
0.365
Pipe Smys
35000
Pipe Specification
Unknown
Pipe Seam Type
Lap Welded
Pipe Manufacturer
Unknown
Pipe Coating Type
None
Installation Year
1928
Manufactured Year
1928
Material Involved
Carbon Steel
Release Type
Mechanical Puncture
Puncture Axial
3
Puncture Circum
8
Wildlife Impact Ind
No
Soil Contamination
Yes
Long Term Assessment
Yes
Remediation Ind
Yes
Groundwater Remed Ind
Yes
Soil Remed Ind
Yes
Water Contam Ind
No
Could Be Hca
Yes
Commodity Reached Hca
No
Est Cost Oper Paid
0
Est Cost Gas Released
480000
Est Cost Prop Damage
20000
Est Cost Emergency
25000
Est Cost Environmental
500000
Est Cost Other
0
Est Cost Other Details
Estimated Cost Of 8.a Is Unknown At This Time.
Prpty
1025000
Accident Psig
287
Mop Psig
753
Accident Pressure
Pressure Did Not Exceed Mop
Pressure Restriction Ind
No
Length Segment Isolated
42240
Internal Inspection Ind
Yes
Operation Complications Ind
No
Pipeline Function
> 20% Smys Regulated Transmission
Scada In Place Ind
Yes
Scada Operating Ind
Yes
Scada Functional Ind
Yes
Scada Detection Ind
Yes
Scada Conf Ind
Yes
Cpm In Place Ind
No
Investigation Status
No, the operator did not find that an investigation of the controller(s) actions or control room issues was necessary due to: (provide an explanation for why the operator did not investigate)
Investigation Status Details
The release was caused by third-party damage.
Employee Drug Test Ind
No
Contractor Drug Test Ind
No
Cause
Excavation Damage
Cause Details
Excavation Damage By Third Party
Ex Party Type
Excavation Damage By Third Party
Prior Notification Ind
No
Notify Cga Dirt
No
Private Row Ind
Yes
Private Subtype
Private Business
Excavator Type
Contractor
Excavator Equipment
Trencher
Work Performed
Liquid Pipeline
One Call Notified Ind
Yes
One Call Ticket Num
1365713345
One Call Center Name
Dig-Tess
Locator Type
Utility Owner
Visible Marks
Yes
Root Cause Category
Excavation Issue
Root Cause Type
Improper Excavation Practice Not Listed Above
Preparer Name
S****** E*******
Preparer Title
Sr. Regulatory Coordinator
Preparer Email
S***************@h**********.com
Preparer Telephone
575-748-8943
Preparer Fax
214-540-1325
Prepared Date
2013-07-12 00:00:00
Authorizer Name
S****** E*******
Authorizer Telephone
575-748-8943
Authorizer Title
Sr. Regulatory Coordinator
Authorizer Email
S***************@h**********.com
Narrative
Tech con trenching struck the pipeline while trenching on june 12, 2013. Tech con had failed to (1) send proper one-call notification; (2) accurately identify or white line the area of excavation; or (3) notify holly energy prior to excavating and/or exposing (pot-holing) the pipeline so that holly energy could re-mark the pipeline and witness this excavation process as requested in accordance with texas utility code subchapter d sec. 251.151(c). Tech con trenching never notified holly energy of its intent to excavate across holly energy's pipeline. Holly energy received a one-call notice from jd king on the evening of june 6. Holly energy does not fully understand the connection between tech con trenching and jd king, but both entities appeared to have been working on the same project for which tech con trenching was conducting trenching on june 13. On the morning of june 7, john osborne of holly energy called ricky knelsen of jd king at the number identified on the one-call notification ticket but received no response. On the morning of june 10 (june 8 and 9 were weekend days), osborne reached knelsen by telephone to request a description of where jd king planned to excavate. The one-call ticket did not provide a clear identification of the area, and neither jd king (nor tech con trenching) had marked the proposed excavation area with white lines. After osborne explained the location of holly energy's pipeline, knelsen told osborne that jd king would not start excavating in the vicinity of the pipeline until the week of june 17. Osborne and knelsen agreed that the two would meet at the site at this time so that knelsen could identify where the excavation would cross the pipeline and osborne would mark the pipeline in advance of trenching activities. Knelsen said that he would call osborne when the excavation was closer to the pipeline to arrange the meeting specifics. Osborne also told knelsen that holly energy wished to be present during excavation so that osborne could visually observe pot-holes cored adjacent to the pipeline and to ensure that excavation below holly energy's pipeline was performed safely. As indicated above, knelsen told osborne that jd king would not arrive to the pipeline area until the week of june 17. But, the excavators moved into the area much sooner than osborne had been told, and neither knelsen nor anyone else with jd king called osborne to inform him of this fact. On june 12, excavation equipment hit holly energy's pipeline, causing significant damage and the release of product to the environment. It is noteworthy that, as a result of a prior one-call notification, holly energy's pipeline was already marked in the area where the trenching equipment hit the pipeline with yellow pin flags. Holly energy's yellow pin flags. Holly energy's yellow pin flags were still present and visible when holly energy representatives arrived to the site after its line was struck.
Report Received Date 2013-07-12 00:00:00
Iyear 2013
Report Number 20130246
Supplemental Number 18285
Report Type Supplemental Final
Operator Id 32011 PHMSA Enforcement
Name Holly Energy Partners - Operating, L.p.
Operator Street Address 2323 Victory Ave. Suite 1400
Operator City Name Dallas
Operator State Abbreviation TX
Operator Postal Code 75219
Local Datetime 2013-06-12 14:04:00
Location Latitude 31.93856 Google Maps OpenStreetMap
Location Longitude -102.22691 Google Maps OpenStreetMap
Commodity Released Type Refined And/or Petroleum Product (Non-Hvl) Which Is A Liquid At Ambient Conditions
Commodity Subtype Gasoline (Non-Ethanol)
Unintentional Release Bbls 4153
Recovered Bbls 1119
Fatality Ind No
Fatal 0
Injury Ind No
Injure 0
Accident Identifier Cpm Leak Detection System Or Scada-Based Information (Such As Alarm(S), Alert(S), Event(S), And/or Volume Calculations)
Incident Identified Datetime 2013-06-12 14:04:00
System Part Involved Onshore Pipeline, Including Valve Sites
On Off Shore Onshore
Shutdown Due Accident Ind No
Shutdown Explain The Pipeline Was At A Shutdown State When The Incident Occurred.
On Site Datetime 2013-06-12 15:30:00
Nrc Rpt Datetime 2013-06-12 16:11:00
Nrc Rpt Num 1050220 NRC Report How to search
Ignite Ind No
Explode Ind No
Upstream Valve Type Ind Manual
Downstream Valve Type Ind Manual
Num Pub Evacuated 0
Pipe Fac Name 10" Fintex
Segment Name Fintex: Midland To Wheeler
Onshore State Abbreviation Tx
Onshore Postal Code 79701
Onshore City Name Midland
Onshore County Name Midland
Designated Location Milepost/valve Station
Designated Name W Airport Vlv
Federal No
Location Type Pipeline Right-Of-Way
Incident Area Type Underground
Incident Area Subtype Under Soil
Depth Of Cover 18
Crossing No
Pipe Facility Type Intrastate
Item Involved Pipe
Pipe Type Pipe Body
Pipe Diameter 10.75
Pipe Wall Thickness 0.365
Pipe Smys 35000
Pipe Specification Unknown
Pipe Seam Type Lap Welded
Pipe Manufacturer Unknown
Pipe Coating Type None
Installation Year 1928
Manufactured Year 1928
Material Involved Carbon Steel
Release Type Mechanical Puncture
Puncture Axial 3
Puncture Circum 8
Wildlife Impact Ind No
Soil Contamination Yes
Long Term Assessment Yes
Remediation Ind Yes
Groundwater Remed Ind Yes
Soil Remed Ind Yes
Water Contam Ind No
Could Be Hca Yes
Commodity Reached Hca No
Est Cost Oper Paid 0
Est Cost Gas Released 480000
Est Cost Prop Damage 20000
Est Cost Emergency 25000
Est Cost Environmental 500000
Est Cost Other 0
Est Cost Other Details Estimated Cost Of 8.a Is Unknown At This Time.
Prpty 1025000
Accident Psig 287
Mop Psig 753
Accident Pressure Pressure Did Not Exceed Mop
Pressure Restriction Ind No
Length Segment Isolated 42240
Internal Inspection Ind Yes
Operation Complications Ind No
Pipeline Function > 20% Smys Regulated Transmission
Scada In Place Ind Yes
Scada Operating Ind Yes
Scada Functional Ind Yes
Scada Detection Ind Yes
Scada Conf Ind Yes
Cpm In Place Ind No
Investigation Status No, the operator did not find that an investigation of the controller(s) actions or control room issues was necessary due to: (provide an explanation for why the operator did not investigate)
Investigation Status Details The release was caused by third-party damage.
Employee Drug Test Ind No
Contractor Drug Test Ind No
Cause Excavation Damage
Cause Details Excavation Damage By Third Party
Ex Party Type Excavation Damage By Third Party
Prior Notification Ind No
Notify Cga Dirt No
Private Row Ind Yes
Private Subtype Private Business
Excavator Type Contractor
Excavator Equipment Trencher
Work Performed Liquid Pipeline
One Call Notified Ind Yes
One Call Ticket Num 1365713345
One Call Center Name Dig-Tess
Locator Type Utility Owner
Visible Marks Yes
Root Cause Category Excavation Issue
Root Cause Type Improper Excavation Practice Not Listed Above
Preparer Name S****** E*******
Preparer Title Sr. Regulatory Coordinator
Preparer Email S***************@h**********.com
Preparer Telephone 575-748-8943
Preparer Fax 214-540-1325
Prepared Date 2013-07-12 00:00:00
Authorizer Name S****** E*******
Authorizer Telephone 575-748-8943
Authorizer Title Sr. Regulatory Coordinator
Authorizer Email S***************@h**********.com
Narrative Tech con trenching struck the pipeline while trenching on june 12, 2013. Tech con had failed to (1) send proper one-call notification; (2) accurately identify or white line the area of excavation; or (3) notify holly energy prior to excavating and/or exposing (pot-holing) the pipeline so that holly energy could re-mark the pipeline and witness this excavation process as requested in accordance with texas utility code subchapter d sec. 251.151(c). Tech con trenching never notified holly energy of its intent to excavate across holly energy's pipeline. Holly energy received a one-call notice from jd king on the evening of june 6. Holly energy does not fully understand the connection between tech con trenching and jd king, but both entities appeared to have been working on the same project for which tech con trenching was conducting trenching on june 13. On the morning of june 7, john osborne of holly energy called ricky knelsen of jd king at the number identified on the one-call notification ticket but received no response. On the morning of june 10 (june 8 and 9 were weekend days), osborne reached knelsen by telephone to request a description of where jd king planned to excavate. The one-call ticket did not provide a clear identification of the area, and neither jd king (nor tech con trenching) had marked the proposed excavation area with white lines. After osborne explained the location of holly energy's pipeline, knelsen told osborne that jd king would not start excavating in the vicinity of the pipeline until the week of june 17. Osborne and knelsen agreed that the two would meet at the site at this time so that knelsen could identify where the excavation would cross the pipeline and osborne would mark the pipeline in advance of trenching activities. Knelsen said that he would call osborne when the excavation was closer to the pipeline to arrange the meeting specifics. Osborne also told knelsen that holly energy wished to be present during excavation so that osborne could visually observe pot-holes cored adjacent to the pipeline and to ensure that excavation below holly energy's pipeline was performed safely. As indicated above, knelsen told osborne that jd king would not arrive to the pipeline area until the week of june 17. But, the excavators moved into the area much sooner than osborne had been told, and neither knelsen nor anyone else with jd king called osborne to inform him of this fact. On june 12, excavation equipment hit holly energy's pipeline, causing significant damage and the release of product to the environment. It is noteworthy that, as a result of a prior one-call notification, holly energy's pipeline was already marked in the area where the trenching equipment hit the pipeline with yellow pin flags. Holly energy's yellow pin flags. Holly energy's yellow pin flags were still present and visible when holly energy representatives arrived to the site after its line was struck.

All rights reserved. Copyright © by ClearPHMSA